Automated vs manual cardiac MRI planning: a single-center prospective evaluation of reliability and scan times - Takeaways - MDSpire

Automated vs manual cardiac MRI planning: a single-center prospective evaluation of reliability and scan times

  • By

  • Carl Glessgen

  • Lindsey A. Crowe

  • Jens Wetzl

  • Michaela Schmidt

  • Seung Su Yoon

  • Jean-Paul Vallée

  • Jean-François Deux

  • January 22, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

  • 1

    Automated cardiac MRI planning could reduce errors and scan times compared to manual planning, enhancing reliability and efficiency.

  • 2

    The study utilized AI-based software to automate CMR acquisition, minimizing human intervention and potential planning errors.

  • 3

    Patients were randomized to receive either automated or manual CMR protocols, ensuring a balanced comparison of both methods.

  • 4

    The automated protocol included additional localizers for better cardiac plane identification, differing from the manual approach.

  • 5

    All examinations were conducted on the same scanner, supervised by trained radiologists to maintain consistency in the study.

Original Source(s)

Automated vs manual cardiac MRI planning: a single-center prospective evaluation of reliability and scan times

  • by Carl Glessgen, Lindsey A. Crowe, Jens Wetzl, Michaela Schmidt, Seung Su Yoon, Jean-Paul Vallée, Jean-François Deux

  • January 22, 2025

Related Content

Crowd-sourcing optimized abdomen CT protocols from 908,000 examinations in a large radiation dose registry

Exploratory machine learning analysis to characterize angioscopic features associated with atherosclerosis-related aortic dissection: an exploratory single-center angioscopic study

The effects of prostate volume and PI-RADS category on optimal PSA-density thresholds for biopsy decision-making