Comparative efficacy and cognitive safety of bifrontal versus bitemporal electroconvulsive therapy in adolescents with major depressive disorder: a retrospective cohort study - Takeaways - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Efficacy and Cognitive Safety Comparison of Bifrontal and Bitemporal Electroconvulsive Therapy in Adolescents with Major Depressive Disorder: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

  • By

  • Xiaolu Chen

  • Ke Liu

  • Xiaoshan Shen

  • Yifan Yang

  • Hao Yu

  • Qibing Chen

  • Xiaoli Wang

  • Xiao Li

  • August 26, 2026

Share

  • 1

    A retrospective cohort study analyzed 217 adolescents with major depressive disorder receiving ECT from January 2018 to June 2024.

  • 2

    Bifrontal ECT showed a numerically higher response rate (85.6%) compared to bitemporal ECT (82.1%), but the difference was not statistically significant.

  • 3

    Subjective memory complaints were significantly lower in the bifrontal group (28.8%) compared to the bitemporal group (67.9%), indicating better cognitive safety.

  • 4

    Post-ictal recovery time was shorter for bifrontal ECT at 23.7 minutes, compared to 33.4 minutes for bitemporal ECT, suggesting quicker recovery.

  • 5

    The study highlights the need for further prospective controlled studies to confirm findings due to its retrospective nature and non-random treatment allocation.

Original Source(s)

Related Content