Nasolacrimal balloon dacryoplasty versus nasolacrimal bi-canalicular intubation for the management of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction with a previous failed probing or intubation: a retrospective study - Takeaways - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Comparison of Nasolacrimal Balloon Dacryoplasty and Bi-canalicular Intubation for Treating Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction After Previous Probing or Intubation: A Retrospective Analysis

  • By

  • Lamiaa Salem

  • Mohamed El Sada

  • Rawan Hosny

  • R. A. El-Essawy

  • May 22, 2026

Share

  • 1

    Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) affects approximately 20% of newborns, with a 90% spontaneous resolution rate within the first year.

  • 2

    Treatment for CNLDO initially involves conservative measures, including observation, lacrimal massage, and topical antibiotics.

  • 3

    Probing has a success rate of 70%–97% for CNLDO, while nasolacrimal duct stent insertion shows a success rate of 79%–96%.

  • 4

    This study compares balloon dacryoplasty and bi-canalicular intubation for recurrent epiphora after failed initial CNLDO procedures.

  • 5

    Patients were grouped based on the procedure received, with allocation influenced by the availability of surgical instruments.

Original Source(s)

Related Content