Incidental findings were identified in 29.8% of patients undergoing whole-body CT for traumatic injuries, necessitating some form of intervention.
2
Findings requiring urgent intervention occurred in an estimated 7.6% of patients, though this estimate has low certainty due to methodological limitations.
3
Most clinically relevant incidental findings were located in the chest, abdomen, or pelvis, with lower detection rates in selective CT of specific regions.
4
The study highlighted the need for standardized classification and reporting systems to improve understanding of incidental findings' clinical implications.
5
Follow-up and intervention implementation for incidental findings varied widely, with rates ranging from 10.3% to 100% depending on the urgency of the findings.
A large audit of biomedical publications suggests fabricated references are increasingly appearing in peer-reviewed papers — often in ways that are difficult for reviewers and readers to detect.
