Real-world comparison of anti-CD20 therapies: efficacy, infections, and immune profiles in a German cohort - Takeaways - MDSpire

Real-world comparison of anti-CD20 therapies: efficacy, infections, and immune profiles in a German cohort

  • By

  • Jakob Stögbauer

  • Moritz Bewarder

  • Linda Groß

  • Lorenz Thurner

  • Klaus Fassbender

  • Rebecca Urschel

  • Einar A. Høgestøl

  • Gro O. Nygaard

  • Hanne F. Harbo

  • Olaf Stüve

  • Marc Pawlitzki

  • Sven G. Meuth

  • Martina Sester

  • Sergiu Groppa

  • Mathias Fousse

  • May 12, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

  • 1

    The study analyzed 262 patients treated with ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, or rituximab over a median of 36 months for neuroimmunological diseases.

  • 2

    Ocrelizumab and ofatumumab demonstrated low annual relapse rates of 0.11 and 0.08, respectively, indicating effective B-cell depletion.

  • 3

    Ofatumumab was associated with significantly lower infection rates compared to rituximab, highlighting differences in safety profiles.

  • 4

    Rituximab patients experienced hypogammaglobulinemia more frequently and earlier than those treated with ocrelizumab or ofatumumab.

  • 5

    The findings suggest that while B-cell depletion is effective, variations in immune responses and infection risks should guide individualized treatment strategies.

Original Source(s)

Related Content