Prognostic value of existing scoring systems for early mortality in phase I immunotherapy trials: a head-to-head real-world cohort study - Takeaways - MDSpire

Evaluating the Prognostic Utility of Established Scoring Systems for Early Mortality in Phase I Immunotherapy Trials: A Comparative Real-World Cohort Analysis

  • By

  • Paloma Sangro

  • Ana Landa-Magdalena

  • Miguel Sogbe

  • Teresa Zumarraga

  • Ignacio Matos

  • Mariano Ponz-Sarvise

  • Marina Crespo

  • María Esperanza Rodriguez-Ruiz

  • Anna Vilalta-Lacarra

  • Eduardo Castañón

  • July 20, 2026

Share

  • 1

    The study analyzed 844 patients in phase I immunotherapy trials to compare the prognostic performance of five established scoring systems.

  • 2

    All five prognostic scores demonstrated statistically significant prognostic stratification, with C-index values ranging from 0.55 to 0.69.

  • 3

    The ROPRO score had the highest 3-month AUC of 0.76, indicating better predictive performance compared to the other scores.

  • 4

    No scoring system identified a subgroup of patients with a median overall survival below the 3-month threshold.

  • 5

    The findings suggest that while scores stratify prognosis, they should not be used as rigid exclusion criteria in patient selection.

Original Source(s)

Related Content