Comparison of lattice and pipeline flow diverters for the treatment of distal intracranial aneurysms: an inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis - Takeaways - MDSpire

Comparison of lattice and pipeline flow diverters for the treatment of distal intracranial aneurysms: an inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis

  • By

  • Shiqing Mu

  • Xinke Liu

  • Kaiyu Liu

  • Aoming Jin

  • Yan Zhao

  • Tian-Jie Lyu

  • Wenqi Hu

  • Yangyang Zhou

  • Qichen Peng

  • Xuanping Xie

  • Xiaoxi Zhu

  • Siyu Zhou

  • Jieran Huang

  • Xinjian Yang

  • July 9, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

  • 1

    This study compared the efficacy and safety of Lattice and Pipeline flow diverters for treating unruptured distal intracranial aneurysms.

  • 2

    A total of 47 patients were included, with follow-up imaging conducted at 6 months postoperatively using CTA or DSA.

  • 3

    Aneurysm occlusion rates were similar between the Lattice (77.8%) and Pipeline (75.9%) groups, with no statistically significant difference.

  • 4

    Branch vessel occlusion rates were also comparable, with 16.7% in the Lattice group and 6.9% in the Pipeline group, but not statistically significant.

  • 5

    Factors such as inflow angle, aneurysm neck diameter, and branch vessel origin were associated with incomplete or delayed aneurysm occlusion.

Original Source(s)

Related Content