Cefazolin vs Cloxacillin for Methicillin-Susceptible S aureus Bacteremia: A Meta-Analysis of 2 Randomized - Takeaways - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Cefazolin Compared With Cloxacillin for MSSA Bacteremia: Meta-Analysis of Two Randomized Trials

  • By

  • Todd C. Lee

  • Steven Y. C. Tong

  • Joshua S. Davis

  • Arthur M. Albuquerque

  • Matthew P. Cheng

  • Jacob Dye

  • Nesrin Ghanem-Zoubi

  • Anna L. Goodman

  • Nynke G. L. Jager

  • Achim J. Kaasch

  • Ilse J. E. Kouijzer

  • David C. Lye

  • Alistair R. D. McLean

  • Brendan J. McMullan

  • David L. Paterson

  • Connor Prosty

  • Jason A. Roberts

  • Pierre Tattevin

  • Jonas Tverring

  • Dafna Yahav

  • Emily G. McDonald

  • November 12, 2026

Share

  • 1

    The Bayesian meta-analysis combined 2 randomized trials involving 1579 evaluable patients with MSSA bacteremia across 9 countries and 112 hospitals.

  • 2

    Cefazolin had an odds ratio for 90-day mortality of 0.84 (95% credible interval, 0.59-1.28), with a 95.5% probability of noninferiority within the prespecified margin.

  • 3

    The probability that cefazolin reduced 90-day mortality compared with cloxacillin or flucloxacillin was 81.0%.

  • 4

    Cefazolin was superior for treatment discontinuation due to adverse events, with a 99.9% probability, and for acute kidney injury, with a 98.4% probability.

  • 5

    The analysis included only 2 trials, and limited subgroup enrollment precluded meaningful inferences about endocarditis and S aureus type A blaZ gene carriers.

Original Source(s)

Related Content