Magmaris bioresorbable magnesium scaffold in acute coronary syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis - Takeaways - MDSpire

Magmaris bioresorbable magnesium scaffold in acute coronary syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • By

  • Simon Wölbert

  • Pablo F. F. Escrihuela-Branz

  • Stephanie Gladys Kühne

  • Andrea Patrignani

  • Mauro Chiarito

  • Jan Torzewski

  • Philip W. J. Raake

  • Dario Bongiovanni

  • May 20, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

  • 1

    The Magmaris bioresorbable magnesium scaffold was evaluated for safety and efficacy in acute coronary syndromes compared to drug-eluting stents.

  • 2

    No significant difference in target-lesion failure rates was found between Magmaris and drug-eluting stents at one year.

  • 3

    Target-lesion revascularization rates were significantly higher with Magmaris compared to drug-eluting stents.

  • 4

    Magmaris demonstrated low scaffold thrombosis rates, but its comparative safety and efficacy remain uncertain due to limited evidence.

  • 5

    Further technical improvements in magnesium scaffolds are necessary before considering Magmaris a robust alternative in acute coronary syndromes.

Original Source(s)

Magmaris bioresorbable magnesium scaffold in acute coronary syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • by Simon Wölbert, Pablo F. F. Escrihuela-Branz, Stephanie Gladys Kühne, Andrea Patrignani, Mauro Chiarito, Jan Torzewski, Philip W. J. Raake, Dario Bongiovanni

  • May 20, 2026

Related Content

Community ACS Initiative Reduced EMS Use

A community campaign was linked to lower emergency medical service use and slower care-seeking in high-risk communities.

Invasive NSTEMI Strategy Shows No Benefit in Frail Patients

Frailty severity may identify older patients least likely to benefit—and potentially at higher risk—with invasive management.

The prognostic value of systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) in acute coronary syndrome patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis and systematic review