Comparison of efficacy and safety between native tissue repair and transvaginal mesh for uterine prolapse: a retrospective study - Takeaways - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Native Tissue Repair Versus Transvaginal Mesh in Managing Uterine Prolapse: A Retrospective Analysis

  • By

  • Jing He

  • Huijuan Wang

  • Wei Wang

  • Na Dong

  • June 16, 2026

Share

  • 1

    The study compared native tissue repair (NTR) and transvaginal mesh (TVM) for treating symptomatic uterine prolapse in 86 patients.

  • 2

    TVM had a shorter average operation time and a higher overall complication rate compared to NTR, but a lower recurrence rate.

  • 3

    Both surgical methods significantly improved postoperative symptoms and quality of life, with similar patient satisfaction rates.

  • 4

    The TVM group experienced a longer hospital stay than the NTR group, indicating differences in recovery dynamics.

  • 5

    The findings suggest that while TVM reduces recurrence, it carries a higher risk of complications, necessitating individualized treatment decisions.

Original Source(s)

Comparison of efficacy and safety between native tissue repair and transvaginal mesh for uterine prolapse: a retrospective study

  • by Jing He, Huijuan Wang, Wei Wang, Na Dong

  • June 16, 2026

Related Content

Hysterectomy and the risk of urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Surgeons Describe Rescue Barriers

Interviews with surgeons linked rescue failures to hierarchy, self-reliance, communication barriers, and system pressures.

Layered precision suturing vs. traditional double-layer closure at cesarean: a randomized trial of uterine scar healing and maternal outcomes