Transrectal versus transperineal prostate fusion biopsy: a pair-matched analysis to evaluate accuracy and complications - Takeaways - MDSpire

Transrectal versus transperineal prostate fusion biopsy: a pair-matched analysis to evaluate accuracy and complications

  • By

  • Marco Oderda

  • Romain Diamand

  • Rawad Abou Zahr

  • Julien Anract

  • Gregoire Assenmacher

  • Nicolas Barry Delongchamps

  • Alexandre Patrick Bui

  • Daniel Benamran

  • Giorgio Calleris

  • Charles Dariane

  • Mariaconsiglia Ferriero

  • Gaelle Fiard

  • Fayek Taha

  • Alexandre Fourcade

  • Georges Fournier

  • Karsten Guenzel

  • Adam Halinski

  • Giancarlo Marra

  • Guillaume Ploussard

  • Katerina Rysankova

  • Jean-Baptiste Roche

  • Giuseppe Simone

  • Olivier Windisch

  • Paolo Gontero

  • September 25, 2024

  • 0 min

Share

  • 1

    The transperineal (TP) approach is recommended over the transrectal (TR) method for prostate biopsies due to lower infection risks.

  • 2

    A pair-matched analysis of 4652 patients showed higher clinically significant prostate cancer detection rates with TP biopsies compared to TR biopsies.

  • 3

    Complications were rare and similar between TP and TR biopsy groups, with no significant differences in post-biopsy infection rates.

  • 4

    TP biopsies demonstrated superior detection rates for clinically significant prostate cancer in both anterior and posterior lesions.

  • 5

    Despite higher csPCa detection with TP, TR biopsies had a better overall cancer detection rate during systematic sampling.

Original Source(s)

Related Content