Comparison of Trial-Collected and Parent-Reported Race and Ethnicity in a Children’s Oncology Group Trial - Takeaways - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Comparing Race and Ethnicity Recorded in a Children’s Oncology Group Trial With Parent-Reported Information

  • By

  • Callie Fry

  • Eva Robinson

  • Edie Weller

  • Morgan A. Paul

  • Rahela Aziz-Bose

  • Leanne Duhaney

  • McKenzie Griffin

  • Kristine Karvonen

  • Colleen A. Kelly

  • Sunyu Kang

  • Haley Newman

  • Puja J. Umaretiya

  • Daniel J. Zheng

  • Sumit Gupta

  • Rachel E. Rau

  • David T. Teachey

  • Sarah Alexander

  • John A. Kairalla

  • Kira Bona

  • November 11, 2026

Share

  • 1

    This study compared race and ethnicity recorded by the Children’s Oncology Group with information reported by parents of US participants in a pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia trial.

  • 2

    Trial-collected race and ethnicity were missing for 8.7% of participants, compared with 1.0% for parent-reported information.

  • 3

    Agreement was moderate for race (72.8%; κ = 0.45) and substantial for ethnicity (83.0%; κ = 0.65) and combined race and ethnicity (78.6%; κ = 0.67).

  • 4

    Concordance was lowest for parent-reported multiracial participants (11.6%); 47.8% were classified by the trial as non-Hispanic White.

  • 5

    The authors reported that CRF-based classification misclassified 1 in 5 children and called for parent- or self-reported race and ethnicity data in NCTN trials.

Original Source(s)

Related Content