Significant Liver-Related Morbidity After Bariatric Surgery and Its Reversal—a Case Series - Top-Institutions - MDSpire

Significant Liver-Related Morbidity After Bariatric Surgery and Its Reversal—a Case Series

  • By

  • Magdalena Eilenberg

  • Felix B. Langer

  • Andrea Beer

  • Michael Trauner

  • Gerhard Prager

  • Katharina Staufer

  • September 30, 2017

  • 0 min

Share

Top Institutions in Surgery

Brief introduction explaining scope and methodology.

  • #1

    Mayo Clinic
    Mayo Clinic

    Rochester, MN

    Key Differentiators

    • Hepatology
    • Bariatric Surgery
    • Metabolic Medicine

  • #2

    Cleveland Clinic
    Cleveland Clinic

    Cleveland, OH

    Key Differentiators

    • Bariatric Surgery
    • Hepatology
    • Gastroenterology

  • #3

    Mount Sinai Health System
    Mount Sinai Health System

    New York, NY

    Key Differentiators

    • Hepatology
    • Bariatric Surgery
    • Endocrinology

  • #4

    University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Medical Center
    University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Medical Center

    San Francisco, CA

    Key Differentiators

    • Hepatology
    • Bariatric Surgery
    • Transplant Surgery

  • #5

    Johns Hopkins Hospital
    Johns Hopkins Hospital

    Baltimore, MD

    Key Differentiators

    • Hepatology
    • Bariatric Surgery
    • Gastroenterology

Original Source(s)

Significant Liver-Related Morbidity After Bariatric Surgery and Its Reversal—a Case Series

  • by Magdalena Eilenberg, Felix B. Langer, Andrea Beer, Michael Trauner, Gerhard Prager, Katharina Staufer

  • September 30, 2017

Related Content

Global Trends and Research Topics in Gastric Bypass Clinical Trials: A Bibliometric Analysis and Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) Study

Adipokine profiles and genetic variants of leptin receptor, adiponectin, and ghrelin pathways in obesity: prospective 12-month outcomes after bariatric interventions

A Smarter Screen for Sleep Apnea Stimulation

A four-factor staging system stratified response rates from 90.9% to 37.5% in a retrospective cohort study, although the model showed only moderate discrimination (C statistic, 0.68) and requires external validation