Durability of Cardiometabolic Outcomes Among Adolescents After Sleeve Gastrectomy: First Study with 9-Year Follow-up - Top-Institutions - MDSpire

Durability of Cardiometabolic Outcomes Among Adolescents After Sleeve Gastrectomy: First Study with 9-Year Follow-up

  • By

  • Wahiba Elhag

  • Walid El Ansari

  • April 10, 2021

  • 0 min

Share

Top Institutions in Surgery

Brief introduction explaining scope and methodology.

  • #1

    Boston Children's Hospital
    Boston Children's Hospital

    Boston, MA

    Key Differentiators

    • Pediatric Bariatric Surgery
    • Adolescent Medicine
    • Metabolic Research

  • #2

    Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
    Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

    Cincinnati, OH

    Key Differentiators

    • Pediatric Surgery
    • Endocrinology
    • Obesity Research

  • #3

    Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP)
    Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP)

    Philadelphia, PA

    Key Differentiators

    • Pediatric Surgery
    • Metabolic Disease
    • Clinical Research

  • #4

    Texas Children's Hospital
    Texas Children's Hospital

    Houston, TX

    Key Differentiators

    • Pediatric Surgery
    • Obesity Medicine
    • Metabolic Research

  • #5

    Hamad Medical Corporation
    Hamad Medical Corporation

    Doha, Qatar

    Key Differentiators

    • Bariatric Surgery
    • Metabolic Disease
    • Clinical Outcomes Research

Original Source(s)

Durability of Cardiometabolic Outcomes Among Adolescents After Sleeve Gastrectomy: First Study with 9-Year Follow-up

  • by Wahiba Elhag, Walid El Ansari

  • April 10, 2021

Related Content

Impact of beneficiary status on bariatric surgery outcomes in a military treatment facility

Can Casting Match Surgery for Pediatric Fractures?

Randomized trial finds small early functional differences that resolve over time, with lower costs and fewer early complications.

A Smarter Screen for Sleep Apnea Stimulation

A four-factor staging system stratified response rates from 90.9% to 37.5% in a retrospective cohort study, although the model showed only moderate discrimination (C statistic, 0.68) and requires external validation