Negative pressure wound therapy: does it suck? - Top-Institutions - MDSpire

Negative pressure wound therapy: does it suck?

  • By

  • Matthew J Lee

  • Thomas D Pinkney

  • May 6, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Top Institutions in Surgery

Brief introduction explaining scope and methodology.

  • #1

    University of Oxford
    University of Oxford

    Oxford, England

    Key Differentiators

    • Surgery
    • Wound Care
    • Infectious Diseases

  • #2

    University of Birmingham
    University of Birmingham

    Birmingham, England

    Key Differentiators

    • Wound Healing
    • Surgery
    • Clinical Trials

  • #3

    Mayo Clinic
    Mayo Clinic

    Rochester, Minnesota

    Key Differentiators

    • Surgery
    • Wound Care
    • Infectious Diseases

  • #4

    Johns Hopkins University
    Johns Hopkins University

    Baltimore, Maryland

    Key Differentiators

    • Surgery
    • Infectious Diseases
    • Wound Care

  • #5

    Imperial College London
    Imperial College London

    London, England

    Key Differentiators

    • Surgery
    • Wound Healing
    • Clinical Research

Original Source(s)

Negative pressure wound therapy: does it suck?

  • by Matthew J Lee, Thomas D Pinkney

  • May 6, 2025

Related Content

Innovative Semi-Rigid Stabilization: Enhancing Precision in Binocular Vision Navigation of the Female Pelvis

Bioabsorbable Implants May Reduce Symptoms in Flatfoot Surgery

Meta-analysis found similar correction with metallic and bioabsorbable devices, but fewer implant-related symptoms with resorbable implants

Evaluation of Surgical Techniques for Pectus Excavatum in Pediatric Patients: A Retrospective Analysis from a Single Institution