Correction to: Axillary surgery versus no-axillary staging in T1N0 breast cancer: 20-year follow-up of the INT 09/98 randomized clinical trial - Top-Institutions - MDSpire

Correction to: Axillary surgery versus no-axillary staging in T1N0 breast cancer: 20-year follow-up of the INT 09/98 randomized clinical trial

  • November 6, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Top Institutions in Surgery

Brief introduction explaining scope and methodology.

  • #1

    Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
    Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

    New York, NY

    Key Differentiators

    • Breast Surgical Oncology
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Trials

  • #2

    Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
    Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

    Boston, MA

    Key Differentiators

    • Breast Oncology
    • Surgical Oncology
    • Translational Research

  • #3

    MD Anderson Cancer Center
    MD Anderson Cancer Center

    Houston, TX

    Key Differentiators

    • Breast Surgical Oncology
    • Cancer Clinical Trials
    • Oncology Research

  • #4

    European Institute of Oncology
    European Institute of Oncology

    Milan, Lombardy

    Key Differentiators

    • Breast Cancer Surgery
    • Oncology Research
    • Clinical Trials

  • #5

    Royal Marsden Hospital
    Royal Marsden Hospital

    London, England

    Key Differentiators

    • Breast Oncology
    • Surgical Oncology
    • Clinical Research

Original Source(s)

Correction to: Axillary surgery versus no-axillary staging in T1N0 breast cancer: 20-year follow-up of the INT 09/98 randomized clinical trial

  • November 6, 2025

Related Content

Innovations Shaping Women’s Cancer Care in 2026

As we move through 2026, new technologies and refined surgical techniques are transforming outcomes for women facing cancer diagnoses.

  • by

  • March 4, 2026

  • 6 min
Evaluating Ultrasound as a Predictor of Pathological Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Bilateral Synchronous Phyllodes Tumors with Differing Grades and Misleading Axillary 18F-FDG PET-CT Uptake: A Case Study and Review of the Literature