Comparative study of ultrasound shape completion and CBCT-based AR workflows for spinal needle interventions - Top-Institutions - MDSpire

Comparative study of ultrasound shape completion and CBCT-based AR workflows for spinal needle interventions

  • By

  • Tianyu Song

  • Feng Li

  • Felix Pabst

  • Miruna-Alexandra Gafencu

  • Yuan Bi

  • Ulrich Eck

  • Nassir Navab

  • April 15, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Top Institutions in Radiology

Brief introduction explaining scope and methodology.

  • #1

    Johns Hopkins University
    Johns Hopkins University

    Baltimore, MD

    Key Differentiators

    • Interventional Radiology
    • Biomedical Engineering
    • Neurosurgery

  • #2

    Massachusetts General Hospital / Harvard Medical School
    Massachusetts General Hospital / Harvard Medical School

    Boston, MA

    Key Differentiators

    • Interventional Radiology
    • Biomedical Imaging
    • Neurosurgery

  • #3

    Stanford University
    Stanford University

    Stanford, CA

    Key Differentiators

    • Radiology
    • Biomedical Engineering
    • Computer Science

  • #4

    Mayo Clinic
    Mayo Clinic

    Rochester, MN

    Key Differentiators

    • Interventional Radiology
    • Neurosurgery
    • Medical Imaging

  • #5

    University of California, San Francisco (UCSF)
    University of California, San Francisco (UCSF)

    San Francisco, CA

    Key Differentiators

    • Radiology
    • Neurosurgery
    • Biomedical Engineering

Original Source(s)

Comparative study of ultrasound shape completion and CBCT-based AR workflows for spinal needle interventions

  • by Tianyu Song, Feng Li, Felix Pabst, Miruna-Alexandra Gafencu, Yuan Bi, Ulrich Eck, Nassir Navab

  • April 15, 2026

Related Content

Deep-Motion-Net: GNN-based volumetric liver shape reconstruction from single-view 2D projections

Increasing pulmonary artery visibility and diagnostic confidence with ultra-high resolution photon-counting detector CT pulmonary angiography

LLM Explanations: Steps Matter in Radiology

Radiologists assigned to receive step-by-step explanations from a large language model achieved higher diagnostic accuracy in a randomized vignette study, while differential-diagnosis outputs may have increased inappropriate reliance on incorrect model suggestions.