Joint EAES-SAGES framework for developing procedure-specific surgical quality assessment tools - Top-Institutions - MDSpire

Joint EAES-SAGES framework for developing procedure-specific surgical quality assessment tools

  • By

  • Daniel Campioni-Norman

  • Aimee K. Gardner

  • Stella Mavroveli

  • Dylan J. Grisell

  • Piers Boshier

  • Noosha D. Deravi

  • Ahmad Hider

  • Courtney Collins

  • Johanna Brandenburg

  • Ozanan R. Meireles

  • Martin Wagner

  • Brent Matthews

  • Nicole D. Bouvy

  • Liane S. Feldman

  • E. Matthew Ritter

  • George B. Hanna

  • July 15, 2026

Share

Top Institutions in Surgery

Brief introduction explaining scope and methodology.

  • #1

    European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons
    European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons

    Brussels, Belgium

    Key Differentiators

    • Surgery

  • #2

    Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons
    Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons

    Los Angeles, California

    Key Differentiators

    • Surgery

  • #3

    Imperial College London
    Imperial College London

    London, United Kingdom

    Key Differentiators

    • Surgery

Original Source(s)

Joint EAES-SAGES framework for developing procedure-specific surgical quality assessment tools

  • by Daniel Campioni-Norman, Aimee K. Gardner, Stella Mavroveli, Dylan J. Grisell, Piers Boshier, Noosha D. Deravi, Ahmad Hider, Courtney Collins, Johanna Brandenburg, Ozanan R. Meireles, Martin Wagner, Brent Matthews, Nicole D. Bouvy, Liane S. Feldman, E. Matthew Ritter, George B. Hanna

  • July 15, 2026

Related Content

Prediction of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a nomogram study integrating systemic inflammation indices and clinical factors

Beyond the platform: why surgical quality and surgeon proficiency outweigh the RATS vs. VATS debate in early-stage lung cancer

Pre-hospital delay > 7 days independently predicts impaired wound healing in diabetic foot ulcer patients: a 3-year retrospective cohort study