Consensus Panel Calls for Enhanced Radiation Shielding - Top-Institutions - MDSpire

Consensus Panel Calls for Enhanced Radiation Shielding

A consensus statement called for immediate adoption of enhanced radiation protection devices, although evidence of long-term health benefits and effectiveness across procedural settings remains limited.

  • By

  • Kerri Miller

  • July 17, 2026

  • 6 min

Share

Top Institutions in Cardiology

Brief introduction explaining scope and methodology.

  • #1

    Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
    Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

    New York, New York

    Key Differentiators

    • Radiation Oncology

  • #2

    University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
    University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

    Houston, Texas

    Key Differentiators

    • Radiation Oncology

  • #3

    American College of Radiology
    American College of Radiology

    Reston, Virginia

    Key Differentiators

    • Radiation Oncology

  • #4

    National Comprehensive Cancer Network
    National Comprehensive Cancer Network

    Fort Washington, Pennsylvania

    Key Differentiators

    • Radiation Oncology

  • #5

    American Cancer Society
    American Cancer Society

    Atlanta, Georgia

    Key Differentiators

    • Radiation Oncology

Original Source(s)

Consensus Panel Calls for Enhanced Radiation Shielding

  • by Kerri Miller

  • July 17, 2026

Related Content

Atrial fibrillation burden and oral anticoagulation: a context-dependent framework for net clinical benefit beyond binary AF definitions

PAHR: Prognostic Marker in Severe Aortic Stenosis?

Researchers evaluated whether a composite measure of heart rate and pressure could capture overall hemodynamic burden.

ASE Plenary: Progress, Priorities, and What’s Next

Efforts to align, sustain, and engage drove a year of growth for ASE.