The Role of Total Small Bowel Length and its Measurement in Metabolic Bariatric Surgery. A Systematic Review - Top-Institutions - MDSpire

The Role of Total Small Bowel Length and its Measurement in Metabolic Bariatric Surgery. A Systematic Review

  • By

  • Niccolo Petrucciani

  • Chiara Cuzzocrea

  • Margherita Floris

  • Marta Zerunian

  • Nunzio Velotti

  • Paolo Aurello

  • Marta Goglia

  • Maria Vittoria Mascolini

  • Mirto Foletto

  • Chiara Giulia Fontanella

  • Mario Musella

  • Gianfranco Silecchia

  • May 7, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Top Institutions in Surgery

Brief introduction explaining scope and methodology.

  • #1

    Cleveland Clinic Bariatric & Metabolic Institute
    Cleveland Clinic Bariatric & Metabolic Institute

    Cleveland, Ohio

    Key Differentiators

    • Bariatric Surgery

  • #2

    Vanderbilt University Medical Center
    Vanderbilt University Medical Center

    Nashville, Tennessee

    Key Differentiators

    • Bariatric Surgery

  • #3

    General and Laparoscopic Surgery Department
    General and Laparoscopic Surgery Department

    Unknown, Unknown

    Key Differentiators

    • Bariatric Surgery

  • #4

    Northwestern Switzerland
    Northwestern Switzerland

    Unknown, Unknown

    Key Differentiators

    • Bariatric Surgery

  • #5

    Columbia University
    Columbia University

    New York, New York

    Key Differentiators

    • Bariatric Surgery

Original Source(s)

The Role of Total Small Bowel Length and its Measurement in Metabolic Bariatric Surgery. A Systematic Review

  • by Niccolo Petrucciani, Chiara Cuzzocrea, Margherita Floris, Marta Zerunian, Nunzio Velotti, Paolo Aurello, Marta Goglia, Maria Vittoria Mascolini, Mirto Foletto, Chiara Giulia Fontanella, Mario Musella, Gianfranco Silecchia

  • May 7, 2026

Related Content

Correction to: Bariatric Surgery for Patients Living with Obesity and Left Ventricular Dysfunction: Evaluating Perioperative Safety and Postoperative Functional Outcomes

A Smarter Screen for Sleep Apnea Stimulation

A four-factor staging system stratified response rates from 90.9% to 37.5% in a retrospective cohort study, although the model showed only moderate discrimination (C statistic, 0.68) and requires external validation

Publisher Correction: Machine Learning Models for Predicting Significant Liver Fibrosis in Patients with Severe Obesity and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease