The “true” acetabular anteversion angle (AV angle): 2D CT versus 3D model - Top-Institutions - MDSpire

The “true” acetabular anteversion angle (AV angle): 2D CT versus 3D model

  • By

  • Kira A. Barlow

  • Zdzislaw Krol

  • Pawel Skadlubowicz

  • Chao Dong

  • Vanja Zivkovic

  • Andreas H. Krieg

  • July 27, 2022

  • 0 min

Share

Top Institutions in Surgery

Brief introduction explaining scope and methodology.

  • #1

    Hospital for Special Surgery
    Hospital for Special Surgery

    New York, NY

    Key Differentiators

    • Orthopedic Surgery
    • Musculoskeletal Radiology
    • Biomechanics

  • #2

    Mayo Clinic
    Mayo Clinic

    Rochester, MN

    Key Differentiators

    • Orthopedic Surgery
    • Radiology
    • Biomedical Engineering

  • #3

    Johns Hopkins Hospital
    Johns Hopkins Hospital

    Baltimore, MD

    Key Differentiators

    • Orthopedic Surgery
    • Radiology
    • Medical Imaging Research

  • #4

    University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Medical Center
    University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Medical Center

    San Francisco, CA

    Key Differentiators

    • Orthopedic Surgery
    • Radiology
    • 3D Imaging Technology

Original Source(s)

The “true” acetabular anteversion angle (AV angle): 2D CT versus 3D model

  • by Kira A. Barlow, Zdzislaw Krol, Pawel Skadlubowicz, Chao Dong, Vanja Zivkovic, Andreas H. Krieg

  • July 27, 2022

Related Content

Pain, Function, and Satisfaction After Total Knee Arthroplasty, with or Without Bariatric Surgery

Mid-term results show no significant difference in postoperative clinical outcome, pain and range of motion between a well-established total knee arthroplasty design and its successor: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial

Quantifying the anatomical variability of the proximal femur