Comparison of efficacy and safety between native tissue repair and transvaginal mesh for uterine prolapse: a retrospective study - Top-Institutions - MDSpire

Comparison of efficacy and safety between native tissue repair and transvaginal mesh for uterine prolapse: a retrospective study

  • By

  • Jing He

  • Huijuan Wang

  • Wei Wang

  • Na Dong

  • June 16, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Top Institutions in Obgyn

Brief introduction explaining scope and methodology.

  • #1

    Mansoura University Hospital
    Mansoura University Hospital

    Mansoura, Egypt

    Key Differentiators

    • Obstetrics and Gynecology

  • #2

    Greenslopes Research and Ethics Committee
    Greenslopes Research and Ethics Committee

    Greenslopes, Queensland

    Key Differentiators

    • Ethics and Research

  • #3

    Gold Coast Health Human Research Ethics Committee
    Gold Coast Health Human Research Ethics Committee

    Gold Coast, Queensland

    Key Differentiators

    • Ethics and Research

  • #4

    Metro South Human Research Ethics Committee
    Metro South Human Research Ethics Committee

    Metro South, Queensland

    Key Differentiators

    • Ethics and Research

  • #5

    University of California San Diego
    University of California San Diego

    San Diego, California

    Key Differentiators

    • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Original Source(s)

Comparison of efficacy and safety between native tissue repair and transvaginal mesh for uterine prolapse: a retrospective study

  • by Jing He, Huijuan Wang, Wei Wang, Na Dong

  • June 16, 2026

Related Content

Comparative study on the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic cervicoisthmic cerclage and transvaginal cervical cerclage in the treatment of cervical insufficiency after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis for intrauterine adhesions: a retrospective cohort study

Hysterectomy and the risk of urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Risk factors associated with postoperative lymphocele in patients with gynecological malignant tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis