Artificial intelligence for X-ray scaphoid fracture detection: a systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis - Top-Institutions - MDSpire

Artificial intelligence for X-ray scaphoid fracture detection: a systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis

  • By

  • Matan Kraus

  • Roi Anteby

  • Eli Konen

  • Iris Eshed

  • Eyal Klang

  • December 15, 2023

  • 0 min

Share

Top Institutions in Radiology

Brief introduction explaining scope and methodology.

  • #1

    Mayo Clinic
    Mayo Clinic

    Rochester, MN

    Key Differentiators

    • Orthopedic Surgery
    • Radiology
    • Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

  • #2

    Johns Hopkins University
    Johns Hopkins University

    Baltimore, MD

    Key Differentiators

    • Radiology
    • Orthopedics
    • Biomedical Engineering

  • #3

    Massachusetts General Hospital / Harvard Medical School
    Massachusetts General Hospital / Harvard Medical School

    Boston, MA

    Key Differentiators

    • Radiology
    • Orthopedic Surgery
    • Artificial Intelligence Research

  • #4

    Stanford University
    Stanford University

    Stanford, CA

    Key Differentiators

    • Radiology
    • Orthopedics
    • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

  • #5

    University of California, San Francisco (UCSF)
    University of California, San Francisco (UCSF)

    San Francisco, CA

    Key Differentiators

    • Radiology
    • Orthopedic Surgery
    • AI in Medical Imaging

Original Source(s)

Artificial intelligence for X-ray scaphoid fracture detection: a systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis

  • by Matan Kraus, Roi Anteby, Eli Konen, Iris Eshed, Eyal Klang

  • December 15, 2023

Related Content

Mammography AI Spots Vascular Signals

Routine breast imaging offers opportunity for cardiovascular risk assessment.

A lightweight CVTC model for accurate Alzheimer’s MRI analysis and lesion annotation

Global Cardiac Imaging Radiation Varies Widely

International study of more than 19,000 patients finds substantial differences in radiation exposure from coronary artery disease imaging across modalities, regions, and income levels.