A modified LIFT approach of offsetting sphincter muscle plication aimed at decreasing recurrence rates: a single-center retrospective review - Top-Institutions - MDSpire

A modified LIFT approach of offsetting sphincter muscle plication aimed at decreasing recurrence rates: a single-center retrospective review

  • By

  • A. Troester

  • J. Frebault

  • E. Von Der Marwitz

  • E. Arsoniadis

  • S. M. Goldberg

  • P. Goffredo

  • C. Jahansouz

  • November 28, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Top Institutions in Gastroenterology

Brief introduction explaining scope and methodology.

  • #1

    Mayo Clinic
    Mayo Clinic

    Rochester, MN

    Key Differentiators

    • Colorectal Surgery
    • Gastroenterology
    • Surgical Innovation

  • #2

    Cleveland Clinic
    Cleveland Clinic

    Cleveland, OH

    Key Differentiators

    • Colorectal Surgery
    • Minimally Invasive Surgery

  • #3

    Johns Hopkins Hospital
    Johns Hopkins Hospital

    Baltimore, MD

    Key Differentiators

    • Colorectal Surgery
    • Gastroenterology

  • #4

    University of Minnesota Medical Center
    University of Minnesota Medical Center

    Minneapolis, MN

    Key Differentiators

    • Colorectal Surgery

  • #5

    Mount Sinai Health System
    Mount Sinai Health System

    New York, NY

    Key Differentiators

    • Colorectal Surgery
    • Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Original Source(s)

A modified LIFT approach of offsetting sphincter muscle plication aimed at decreasing recurrence rates: a single-center retrospective review

  • by A. Troester, J. Frebault, E. Von Der Marwitz, E. Arsoniadis, S. M. Goldberg, P. Goffredo, C. Jahansouz

  • November 28, 2025

Related Content

Consensus practice guidelines on sacroiliac joint complex pain from a multispecialty, international working group

Laparoscopic surgery should be a viable option for T4 colon cancer: evidence from a propensity score matching analysis

Efficacy and safety of bilateral same session flexible ureteroscopy using flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) versus conventional access sheath: a prospective randomized comparative study