Quantifying treatment burden: the patient burden score a study of 758 patients across three clinical urologic scenarios - Top-Institutions - MDSpire

Quantifying treatment burden: the patient burden score a study of 758 patients across three clinical urologic scenarios

  • By

  • Ofer N. Gofrit

  • S. Nahum Goldberg

  • Amitay Lorber

  • Mordechai Duvdevani

  • Marc Wygoda

  • Guy Hidas

  • Vladimir Yutkin

  • Liat Appelbaum Pikarsky

  • November 27, 2024

  • 0 min

Share

Top Institutions in Urology

Brief introduction explaining scope and methodology.

  • #1

    Mayo Clinic
    Mayo Clinic

    Rochester, MN

    Key Differentiators

    • Urology
    • Clinical Outcomes Research
    • Patient-Reported Outcomes

  • #2

    Johns Hopkins Hospital
    Johns Hopkins Hospital

    Baltimore, MD

    Key Differentiators

    • Urology
    • Health Services Research
    • Surgical Outcomes

  • #3

    Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
    Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

    New York, NY

    Key Differentiators

    • Urologic Oncology
    • Patient-Reported Outcomes
    • Clinical Research

  • #4

    Cleveland Clinic
    Cleveland Clinic

    Cleveland, OH

    Key Differentiators

    • Urology
    • Outcomes Research
    • Patient Care Innovation

  • #5

    University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Medical Center
    University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Medical Center

    San Francisco, CA

    Key Differentiators

    • Urology
    • Health Outcomes Research
    • Patient-Centered Care

Original Source(s)

Quantifying treatment burden: the patient burden score a study of 758 patients across three clinical urologic scenarios

  • by Ofer N. Gofrit, S. Nahum Goldberg, Amitay Lorber, Mordechai Duvdevani, Marc Wygoda, Guy Hidas, Vladimir Yutkin, Liat Appelbaum Pikarsky

  • November 27, 2024

Related Content

Experience of 5 years adjustable continence therapy (ProACT): the surgical learning curve and patient outcomes

Correction: SMART stone multidisciplinary team (MDT) and patient care: recommendations for the adult high-risk kidney stone patient pathway

Management of clinical failure after minimally invasive surgical therapies (MIST) for BPH: repeat MIST versus resection, enucleation or ablation—a narrative review from EAU endourology